Here's a good example of what I mean. Words strung together with the resemblance of a valid point, but on closer inspection there is
no appropriate context. This is one of many USG spam accounts put here to create the illusion of a debate.
Firstly this is to be a dialogue not a debate (to which I have extensively defined especially in relation to what is ideal). 2nd I am by far the most knowledgeable one here on the interrelation of these subjects especially in regards to "what is ideal money". If you have been following the dialog you will also notice I have produced the most content, and especially at least up to the point that it looks absolutely trollish for you to suggest that someone created me as a "spam account" (ie I have proof of work).
It might be others don't appreciate my view and my content, but I have functioned from pure logical and fact. Produced related content that nearly no one, or no one here has been previously made aware of...
I for one would appreciate, that you don't...and that we resume what is called "dialogue", and begin to discuss what is logical and based on fact.
Cliffs: my content is organized on a blog, but it is clearly too big for some.