You honestly think the network failing to confirm transactions is good for the future of Bitcoin?  If several blocks in a row end up full and people are left waiting for their transactions to go through, you think that's going to help improve things?  I don't care how much you think you've done the math to support your side of the debate, you haven't considered the consequences and repercussions of placing artificial limits on a system that will work just fine without them.  You've considered about the consequences of removing them, stating it might one day in the distant future lead to centralisation.  But even if that happens, it's far more likely that full blocks will happen first.  Can we please deal with the hurdles in the order that they appear?