I think now we are starting to think together!
Considering this is the amount of new content you added to the thread in your last spam-wall-of-a-post, can you still tell me with straight face that you aren't a paid USG muppet?
Ok here is the thing. You mentioned something about me stringing words together:
Here's a good example of what I mean. Words strung together with the resemblance of a valid point, but on closer inspection there is
no appropriate context. This is one of many USG spam accounts put here to create the illusion of a debate.
But it become quite clear to me that you have not understood the material in the Wealth of Nation so much so, that I am "pretty sure" that you haven't read the book
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=941331.msg10472883#msg10472883Furthermore, we all know I am the only one here (again I looked forward to being contested) that is familiar with 20 years of lectures on the topic of "Ideal Money". http://sites.stat.psu.edu/~babu/nash/money.pdf
So what we have revealed through dialogue, is that you have not even traversed the most relevant and significant material to this subject. And so now we understand why my words and points read like gibberish to you, but we should not necessarily take that to mean that I'm speaking irrelevently.