Your own words contradict yourself as you have already admitted that part of the purpose of these nodes is to prevent the hardfork , than begin to lie by claiming I am making up mythologies and alluding to the fact that I am some conspiracy theorist.
Yes you are some sort of conspiracy theorist. If I have made a mistake, it was in suggesting that the pogo is meant to combat a hard-fork. The hard-fork isn't going to happen. The mythology comment was in reference to the "ten thousand nodes" thing.
Mistake ....yeah, that's the ticket.... sure, buddy... So how often do you make "mistakes" which suggest the exact opposite of what you said before ?
Quote from: danielpbarron link=topic=919629.480
The "10k nodes" was suggested by nubbins`, not MP. Some of us in -assets are testing the unit out, but no substantial quantities have been purchased. Regardless, the purpose of this device is partly to combat the hard fork. The fact that they are incompatible with gavincoin is by design;
In reality, I could care less if those nodes are intended to partly prevent the hardfork as you originally stated and are now denying. I was just amused that your previous suggestion was considered a serious threat to preventing the hard fork.
I like the idea of those 10k nodes, but they look underpowered for the bitcoin to come so I will be planning to deploy nodes properly equipped to handle the future transactions that our ecosystem needs.