It doesn't matter what miners want. If you had truly been reading the logs, you would have known that.
Yes it matters what miners want.
I guess you don't follow hyperlinks, or know how to use them for that matter. Moving on...
considering the fact that all the 'big' players are likely going to agree on this before anything actually happen..
The big players have agreed: it ain't gonna happen. Take your head out of the sand, and start reading the logs.
these are not 'big' miners, maybe hobbyists at the very best..
ps: thank you but been reading the logs for 1+ year now... but still..
It doesn't matter what miners want. If you had truly been reading the logs, you would have known that.
And if you have been reading the logs, and that one just slipped by: why aren't you in the WoT?
oi im on it
A rating from some nobody does not make you part of the WoT. Go make some friends who actually count.
And to think people in certain corners of the anti-fork crowd were worried that increasing the block size might lead to centralisation at some point in the future. It seems the anti-fork crowd themselves are willfully and deliberately centralising right now.
Being strong opponents of anything faintly resembling socialism, we are not opposed to hierarchies. Whereas you, a contemptible piece of socialist scum, are an opponent of a decentralized monetary system. See the difference? Whatever, doesn't matter.
What about decentralized projects like twister , lighthouse , and openbazaar that have limitations imposed by the 1MB block size?
What about them? I don't see them in the WoT. Regardless, do you think we are going to compromise the soundness of our money so that some derpy kickstarter replacement can get a free ride on the blockchain? You're insane.