Yep. Not encrypted, and staking=true
Are you seeing any orphaned blocks, or just nothing at all?
That's the other odd thing - according to my transaction list, none of the blocks I've created have ever been orphaned. The list shows 256 "generate" transactions, all with nonzero confirmations (ie, they've been accepted by the network). No mention of the word "orphan" anywhere. I've mentioned this before, as it does seem unusual. I'm running the headless daemon compiled from source.
Version v1.4.8 of the client, which I tagged for building yesterday and should have binaries available for download soon logs how long each staking attempt took, like this:
2015-02-18 05:09:45 stake took 7s
2015-02-18 05:10:00 stake took 6s
2015-02-18 05:10:17 stake took 7s
2015-02-18 05:10:32 stake took 6s
2015-02-18 05:10:49 stake took 7s
2015-02-18 05:11:03 successful stake took 5s
2015-02-18 05:11:03 CheckStake() : new proof-of-stake block found
You can expect to see each attempt take 0s if you only have a small number of outputs to check each 16 seconds, but the fact that you see it at all is proof that it is attempting to stake.
2015-02-18 05:09:45 stake took 7s
2015-02-18 05:10:00 stake took 6s
2015-02-18 05:10:17 stake took 7s
2015-02-18 05:10:32 stake took 6s
2015-02-18 05:10:49 stake took 7s
2015-02-18 05:11:03 successful stake took 5s
2015-02-18 05:11:03 CheckStake() : new proof-of-stake block found
You can expect to see each attempt take 0s if you only have a small number of outputs to check each 16 seconds, but the fact that you see it at all is proof that it is attempting to stake.
Looks like I just missed out on that change - updated a couple of days ago, and neither the debug log or source contain the phrase "stake took." I'll compile a newer version and see what happens.
Another thing to check is whether you have the client configured to hold your balance in "reserve". There's a setting where you can specify that you want to always keep a certain balance available, and that balance never attempts to stake. If you have it set to the same as your full balance you would see what you're seeing.
That's 'reservebalance' and as per my earlier message there is definitely none reserved.
