i still would like to hear when you think such a change is necessary.
you dont seem to be against any blocksize change as long as it is not needed: how do you define needed in this case?
In his view, there is no definition of needed in this case. (hope that I'm not mistaken)
A max block size is needed because of the asymmetric incentive structure.
--snip--
So... assuming there is a problem, the current proposal is not the solution.
A) I didn't not say that it was not needed.
B) I said that (if I correctly understood him) for him there isn't a situation where a change of the limit is needed.
I've been waiting for this 'solution', instead of just the 'don't fork it' stance.