How did this Ponzi thread get to 198 pages before a trusted user left negative trust?
As you can see this is the most successful Ponzi I've seen in a long time. And I feel that Ponzi need to be marked with negative trust only when they camouflage their scheme and claiming they are not Ponzi. If it is transparent there is no need for negative trust imo.
I think think the negative trust givers are jealous and both run gambling dice sites. They just want the success this is getting. And they feel this sort of clearly labeled gambling paints the wrong picture for bitcoin. What about those dice sites in their sigs? What hippocrates!