How did this Ponzi thread get to 198 pages before a trusted user left negative trust?
As you can see this is the most successful Ponzi I've seen in a long time. And I feel that Ponzi need to be marked with negative trust only when they camouflage their scheme and claiming they are not Ponzi. If it is transparent there is no need for negative trust imo.
Well it was so successful because all the newbies here, I barely see anyone with seniority here.... And it is funny knowing that people invest into ponzi's like that
Newbies are one side of that coin. I think that major attractor is the free faucet. This is really what made this Ponzi popular. And if something is popular people are willing to invest in it.