you cant really be sexist/homophob/racist and a nonagression believer at the same time because being sexist/homophob/racist implies aggression.
How do you figure? Does not associating or wanting to associate with people do violence to them? Am I aggressed against if someone doesn't invite me to a party? Ask me to marry her? Hire me? Give me a loan?
If so, then you seem to have a different understanding of "aggression" than me. I'm talking about initiating physical violence or threat of violence, and I'd like to hear someone make an argument defending doing that.
However, if you agree that that type of aggression is bad, then anything else is changing the subject.
well, telling other people that their languages are some form of "tribal grunt" is a form of aggression in my book. that kind of verbal aggression usually precedes the actual act of physical aggression because that idea is based usually on a concept of a superiority of some sort.
just like the nazis claimed that their race is superior to others and used that construct as an argument to kill 5 mil of jews, you are claiming that you are living in an english dominated world and all non english talkers should suck your dick.