We posted those names as participants in our closed/private review session. Not advisory of any kind. Certainly didn't mean to misrepresent or mislead anyone. Thats why we listed all participators under "
private review session"
So just to clarify, I looked at Pokereum's whitepaper a bit and provided a few comments; I'm not any kind of official advisor. But will be interesting to see this progress.
Noted, I only listed you has one of the private review participators, like many others. If this is a problem I will remove it