This kind of witch hunt depresses my confidence in the forum. Clearly, people would rather trust some anonymous person who posts "new evidence" without base than rational arguments.
With varying definitions of
anonymous and
rational, of course:
I am the owner of
www.cnbtcnews.com. I introduce bitcoin to chinese people.
The evidence is from one person of my qq group.
zhoutong sell LR, and he buy LR from zhoutong.
How does this person know for sure Zhou Thong was behind U9236056?
He buy LR from zhoutong ,zhoutong show the LR account and the total fund is $23439.57.
How do you know he bought it from "ZT" if it was just over electronic communication?
Right, "many" people. Yep, solid evidence here.
Many people in Japan of bitcoin community knows satoshi's satoshidice account, so that's satoshi.
I apologize for my attitude, and apologize in advance if I am wrong (which there is a substantial chance of, I admit). But right now, there is insufficient evidence to convince me that Zhou Tong is guilty.