Re: [Guide] Dogie's Comprehensive Manufacturer Trustworthiness Guide [17th Dec]
Yes only took over a year of complaints to get it right?
You are welcome for all the homework I did for you to fix your rating. Imagine how many people would have been saved buying the lies of Marto74 if you had done a better job.
Too little too late.
Read the changelog.
Why is SP-Tech the only company that is being rated by their business model supporting or not their next gen? Why treat SP-Tech differently and why not reflect the present?
Bias.
Continued...
Look at Technobit's score.
No mention of the fraud perpetrated... and a 10 out of 10 for ethics please do not make me laugh.
On time? Fudge no... many issues for customers on that end.
Refund Issues? Many.
He keeps his "pals" or "customers" in the best range vs. those he has had issues with. I can only imagine what the rating would really be for some of these companies if he wasn't a paid spokesman.
You are welcome for all the homework I did for you to fix your rating. Imagine how many people would have been saved buying the lies of Marto74 if you had done a better job.
Too little too late.
Let's not derail from the main subject. Why are you favoring old and outdated ratings instead of adjusting them to reflect reality?
Read the changelog.
Quote
*Although SpondooliesTech is currently selling out of hand, they have not yet demonstrated that their business model can support this into the next generation. On the announcement of next gen preorders, this rating will return to 'Yes'. On the announcement of next gen in hand / batch sales, this rating will increase to 'Batch' or 'No'.
Why is SP-Tech the only company that is being rated by their business model supporting or not their next gen? Why treat SP-Tech differently and why not reflect the present?
Bias.
| ___________________________________________________________________________ | _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _ |
| Technobit | Product lines: Company Site | Bitcointalk Thread S-Hash, HEX4M, HEX8A1, HEX8A2, HEX16A2, HEX16B, HEX16E, 4HEX16E |
| ___________________________________________________________________________ | |||||||||
| Rating: 74  | Uses own chips? Delivered miners? Uses preorders? | No Yes Batch | 1/10 10/10 16/20 | On time? Quality Issues? Refund Issues? | Yes Minor No | 10/10 6/10 10/10 | Communication Ethics Size | Good Medium | 7/10 10/10 4/10 |
| Last Score: 74 | Designs and sells boards integrating every time of 3rd party chip on the market. |
| ___________________________________________________________________________ | _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _ |
Continued...
Look at Technobit's score.
No mention of the fraud perpetrated... and a 10 out of 10 for ethics please do not make me laugh.
On time? Fudge no... many issues for customers on that end.
Refund Issues? Many.
He keeps his "pals" or "customers" in the best range vs. those he has had issues with. I can only imagine what the rating would really be for some of these companies if he wasn't a paid spokesman.