1. Twipple takes a loan from Ume, and gives his account as collateral. - During this time Twipple was a Member status
No, as shown above, Ume and Twipple were likely the same person before the loan was taken out.
No they were not. Look at the posting history . I can give an escrow or you access to the account, and you can see all the messages of the Twipple account, to see Twipple and Ume are not the same person. Twipple defaulted on a loan, and that is how Ume got it.
4. I contacted Ume , and bought Twipple's account, and right after I bought it, I saw a message sent to TBZ before I bought it begging for money. I just ignored it, and a day later Twipple got banned for 7 days due to Begging.
First you said it was banned after two days, I have shown that they were banned at the same time, now you are saying it was banned the next day. Which one is it?
Does it matter ? Finding faults in statements that don't matter ? I don't remember if it was a day or 2. I jsut remember it getting banned during that time period. Its not even relevant in this context, but you are just saaying this to find lies and making your point strong through an argument that doesn't matter.
Really ? It does prove, that Ume used the account for begging before I bought it from him.
