You are jumping the gun. For heaven's sake, presenting a *vision* that includes, as a minor facet, a traditional business component, is not forming a company. Where on earth have you got these notions from? Come back to earth.
I got these notions from you:
so this is an Inc. now ?
It remains a decentralized technology, with a foundation and a collection of participating blockchain-based projects.
However, you'll soon see our business plan, where we detail the need for traditional trusted entities for off-chain products and services. They will perform functions like escrow, arbitration, gateway services, and mediation.
To this end, the Blocknet - and anyone else who builds a business upon the technology - will need to register as a legal entity. So yes, there will be a Blocknet Inc.You're the one talking business plans, they normally involve, you know, businesses. Legal entities with shareholders and shares. Hence the entirely valid questions, not FUD just because I support superNET.
If I got it wrong I got it wrong, no biggie. The "Is this an Inc. now" followed by the talk of Blocknet Inc immediately brought forth questions pertinent to the intended business structure.