Boom! Fixed. Thanks!
I guess this is temporarily the CF typo report thread, so:
subpeona -> subpoena
Saudia Arabia -> Saudi Arabia
bitcoin -> Bitcoin ( this may depend on your internal style guide for 'bitcoin mining' and 'bitcoin addresses' - your footer reads "Tip with Bitcoin")
Editorially: One of the points of contention was proof of their hashing power. Did you look into Bitmain's claims that they indeed sold 5PH/s of hashing power to them?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=827552.msg9378239#msg9378239( Last I asked about proof in the form of a payment address, they pointed to
a canned response that came down to 'not going to happen because reasons'. )
On-topic: Crikey. Presuming they don't still get out ahead in the end: they should have stuck to selling mining hardware, even if it was rebadged. The writing's been on the wall for that kind of business, but it would surely have been a more graceful eventual exit.
We actually will be looking in to the Bitmain claims in the future. Our resources have been dedicated to sifting through the pages from sources at the moment. We still have barely scratched the surface of what remains we to be found. Thanks for pointing out the errors as well.