Re: Statement about the suspect of recent Bitcoinica hack
This is a classic example of victim blaming.
Zhou has still not been able to explain selling LR using his own QQ account from the LR account Zhou said "the hacker" created.
You conveniently pass this over every time. Your shilling is beyond obvious - I just can't figure out why.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95795.msg1063838#msg1063838
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95795.msg1063850#msg1063850
So, I have done a deal "for a friend" on AurumXchange using my own account.
And I have also done a deal "for a friend" on QQ using a friend's account?
Both happened before I had any clue of the investigation.
I did the deals, but all in much larger amounts with my own account.
And I have also done a deal "for a friend" on QQ using a friend's account?
Both happened before I had any clue of the investigation.
I did the deals, but all in much larger amounts with my own account.
At this point I feel the shilling from rarity, dree12, and Mathew N. Queer comes from getting paid. Either that, or the first two are just sock puppets of this criminal organization spearheaded by Zhou.
You are right, no answer has been given as to why Zhou sold LR from an account that was supposedly opened by a hacker. There won't be either, because he can't make any shit up. He already stuck his foot in its entirety up his mouth on that one.
You know what is really interesting too? Zhou confessed that the email address used on the hacks was his "semi sock puppet secret email" that he used to test vulnerabilities on exchangers. He even went to say that he returned the funds he "stole" from an exchanger after finding a vulnerability.
So far so good... now, CHECK THIS OUT:
Yesterday, sock puppet dree12 starts a very detailed and carefully crafted list of Bitcoin hacks:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=83794.0
MINUTES after he starts this thread, BTC-E get's hack (
). Dree12 happily announces that if the projected numbers are right, the bitcoinica hack is number three on the list now, instead of number two. He posts a sensationalistic header in red big letters stating that the BTC-E hack is going on "Right now!"Coincidence? Maybe... Zhou Tong hacking BTC-E to deflect attention from himself? MOST LIKELY, specially considering his previous statements about his pastime of "Finding vulnerabilities", and the obvious sock puppetry from dree12.
Deflecting attention is a favorite pastime of theirs. Glenn Beck is an advocating of suck sockpuppetry. Another ruse would be to discuss mundane subjects like, I don't know, maybe the proper use of the word "or".
As I've stated prior, I didn't loose a single Satoshi in Bitcoinica, but indirectly I'm paying a heavy toll due to all this. I've had to close (move lumber) three warehouses, two due to EPA regulations and the other over zoning, none of which may have come to light if I had not espoused how wonderful Bitcoin is (and still do) to an acquaintance, whereupon his first foray into Bitcoin was with Bitcoinica.
If it weren't for that, I probably wouldn't have stuck my nose in this mess so heavily, nor started amassing ignores. That aspect really hurts. It wouldn't surprise me at the least that sockpuppets weren't created for the sole purpose of exercising that option. Only the admins here would know for sure.
That said, and with all due respect to those I've held to high standards, I now have no choice but to start pointing fingers.
Full Disclosure: Any actions (that of penning posts) I take is for the betterment of Bitcoin and this community, and NOT for any type of revenge.
For those who don't have me on their ignore list, PLEASE take a full look at Charlie Shrem and that quasi-lawyer, Patrick A. Murck.
Peace, all.
~Bruno~