Blockchain pruning is entirely do-able.
Cool story, but it doesn't really solve anything.
So increasing the blockchain (in size, per block) is not a solution and decreasing it isn't either?
I find this, illogical. What are you proposing?
What he probably means is that pruning does nothing to increase transactions per second.
But it's helping with the management of the bigger blocks which indirectly help the increase of transactions per second.
Davout's opinion on the 20MB fork is correct; your ad hom attacks on him just make you look desperate.
Hello Icetard! How much money do you have left from the HashFail scam?
You forget one thing. It's not Davout's opinion that matters. It's the network's opinion that matters since it's a consensus network!
Are you now going to also accuse Andreas of needing to stop BTC from growing, to satisfy his ego?
Andreas sees the bigger picture. Bigger than what we are discussing here. Since you are too stupid to think for yourself let me tell you that even if Bitcoin becomes a gold-standard for many other currencies
it still needs to support more tps that the present value = biggers block size is needed!
Go back to supporting scamming/failed businesses Icetard!