I'm not talking about fairness. I'm talking about proof-of-stake that includes everyone who pulls an equal amount of weight. There's no difference between premining and early adopters building bunkers. One versus a few still leaves many in a second class category. If you think you can push special tier privileges and expect ppl to go along with it, you're delusional. If you think there's nobody who can repeat the success of bitcoin, you're blind.
Define "pulls an equal amount of weight".
If a coin release schedule is fair, then everyone will have ample time to contemplate, design and debate it before it's released. So no unfair "early adopters".
Early Adopters of successful coins are rewarded for discovery the fact the coin is good. If it weren't for them, the coin wouldn't have started at all, by definition, so they deserve a reward.
Early Adopters of shit coins are "punished" because their investments plummet down the drain.
There is no special tier in StakeCoin, no thresholds. Everyone can participate, big or small.
I think the success of Bitcoin will be unmatched me for many, many years ... it is too revolutionary. This kind of idea doesn't come by every year. There might be improvements (StakeCoin might be one of them), but the basic principles will remain the same.
Sorry, but the UtopiaCoin you'd like to see just can't exist in this world.