I think OP's process of defining sites as a scam is unfair and nothing more than a personal opinion but you havent actually tested anything.
I've had succes with bitobits.biz for 2 days now, just because they used someone others code dont make them a scammer but you put them on the list twice..
He has a personal bias against him based on they used the same code and up till now bitobits has scammed no one. How many times do we need to explain a ponzi scheme? I wouldn't trust this list as far as I could throw it. Its a good basic guide but seems to be a lot of personal vendetta's in who he is saying scam or not, either that or he is just making it up with his own opinions and touting them as fact.
I feel sorry for bitobits, at least wait till he's done one or started scamming. Not fair to jump on the ponzi's before they have done anything wrong.
Lol you are defending bitobits, maybe you are the owner or affiliated with it? Something like this is quite large, mistyping bitget.in instead of bitsobits. My theory is that as they were copying layout over, they forgot to rename it to bitsobits.