Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Games and rounds
Re: CryptoBall ★☆ 0.01BTC, 0.02BTC, & 0.04BTC Discount Codes ☆★
by
Bitcoinexp
on 16/03/2015, 06:00:20 UTC
Quote from: goose20 on March 16, 2015, 05:39:24 AM
Quote from: Bitcoinexp on March 16, 2015, 05:10:04 AM
Quote from: goose20 on March 16, 2015, 04:57:42 AM
Quote from: Bitcoinexp on March 13, 2015, 05:02:44 AM
Just made another set of predictions Smiley

I hope you used free codes for these.

I honestly cant see why anyone would deposit their own coin to play on this site.

1) some coin is taken from pot straight up (how can there be 0.66btc in pot when there are 72 predictions);
2) then they are only paying out about 51% - 55% of what's left;
3) they aren't paying games with 1 or 2 predictions nor are they refunding those ones. Wtf

Unless im wrong on above, once people's free predictions run out, the site will fizzle out.

Sad

1. True. It's to increase predictors because more predictions equal larger share. But honestly, i think most people would agree to raise the pot distribution.
2. Range is actually around 50 to 92% I think. Check about page. I echo my sentiment that pot distribution should be increased to attract players. Maybe a solid 75 to 95%?
3. I think they only refund if you paid for the preds.

But why take from the pot before distribution. If there are 72 predictions at a cost if 0.01btc, how can the pot be 0.66btc.

They state they pay out between 50% and 92% - but when I checked 6 or  so they all were 51% to 55%. Why do that to your players - it'll send then bust super quick.

Refunding only if you paid kinda makes sense. But they should also allocate another free prediction to affected players. A bit unfair to lose a prediction. If another player or 2 played that game - they would have to pay out.


You are mistaken, just check the already discounted bundles. As an example, 10 preds come at a price of 0.06 btc i think. So each pred contributes 0.006 to the pot, not 0.01 and so on.

The higher distribution requires a LOT of predictions to reach 92%. As I mentioned before, yes, i agree something should be done regarding this to attract more predictors.

I agree.

If you have aome more questions, please check out about page on site.
But i am still really happy with the site, regardless of a few blemishes, they are new after all. And they do think highly of customer suggestions, based on past experiences.