Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW, Darksend and InstantX
by
oblox
on 16/03/2015, 14:50:39 UTC
Quote from: MyFarm on March 16, 2015, 02:46:50 PM
Quote from: oblox on March 16, 2015, 02:40:04 PM
Quote from: MyFarm on March 16, 2015, 02:32:30 PM
Quote from: oblox on March 16, 2015, 02:29:10 PM
Quote from: MyFarm on March 16, 2015, 02:27:38 PM
Quote from: oblox on March 16, 2015, 02:23:36 PM
MyFarm, face it, you sold completely out and you're butthurt that the price didn't go as low as you wanted to rebuy. No one with any sort of skin in the game would openly try to derail their own investment.

I didn't completely sell, that's not the way I operate.  I still own some.  Maybe I'm completely incorrect about all of this.  But I feel the danger is real enough that I needed to reduce my position substantially.  As mentioned, I won't buy back into Darkcoin until someone with business acumen is running things.  This isn't FUD trying to rebuy lower.

Good, we could use less of you around here. Smiley

Maybe so.  But what I guarantee you 100% is that you need someone with serious business acumen heading up Darkcoin.  There's too much at stake.  Evan is an amazing developer but his business management and communication skills are very subpar.  You're going to continue to run into serious problems and any serious investor will see that.  You already lost your second most important developer and now have potentially opened yourselves up to serious legal liability.

Not good.

There is still plenty of time in the future for other important roles to be played Dash. Further, to say we lost the second most important developer is a great disservice to UdjinM6, Mr. Hardy, and Mr. Reynders, among countless other contributors.

Second most important developer not just because of their coding ability, but they were one of the few voices of reason and diplomacy.

...and also wanted to take the project in a different direction (targeting more of the DNM's) which was never the intent from the start (but obviously a side effect from a natural privacy solution). How can a project "grow up" if it's directly targeting that demographic?