In the first place, the stuff written at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 isn't really the evidence. It only points at the evidence. When what is expressed at the link is examined in detail, then the evidence is brought out into the open in abundance just like the link states.
God is within the universe as well as without. Therefore universe-style evidence can be used, and extra-universe evidence can be alluded to.
Your end simply ends yourself, or ultimately will, if you don't change.
EDIT: Wow! Page 218 !
1) So, it "isn't really the evidence." Well, I'm glad you finally agree it isn't proof. It's evidence of evidence? So, it's basically worthless on its own as far as reasoning about God. Yep, that's about right.
2) So, you're saying stuff in the Universe is evidence of stuff outside of the Universe. Are you drunk?
3) My end simply...what? What the hell?
When you make up your own word meanings and (invalid) forms of reasoning, you just make meaningless statements. None of what you say is relevant to anything and anyone.
Absolutely. You DO have a hard time figuring much of anything out, don't you? Especially the proofs listed at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, right?
But you just told me they weren't proof(s). You said they weren't even evidence. You said that it was pointing to evidence.
That's about as equivalent as me pointing to a a road sign and asking you what it means -- "STOP!" ...Please.