Quote
Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks.
To translate, because he's that brainwashed BADecker has rewritten the definition of a scientist so it fits his religion better, kind of like how religious people try to re-write history and everything else in order to make the world try and fit in their respective religions, why do you think that they always try to wipe out other cultures' and beliefs? Too bad for him the real world doesn't ever work like that, otherwise why would all these other religions and beliefe systems exist in the first place if his was so perfect?
It gets better than that. On more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now, I've had to remind BadDecker that i believe in God.
And on more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now, BadDecker has responded to my criticism of his reasoning by basically saying I'm wrong because I don't believe in God.
It goes like this:
Him: "Blah blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God."
Me: "Um no, because blah blah."
Him: "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah."
Me: "Still, no, not even close."
Him: "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God and blah blah."
Me: "Um...I believe in God, remember?
Him: "Well, that's a start! And blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God."
Me: "Um, again, no, because blah blah."
Him: "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah."
Me: "No. It's impossible. I've told you this. Everyone has told you this."
Him: "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God! Blah blah."
Me: "'
"Oh, you're simply upset that someone found the proof that God exists before you did. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
EDIT: In addition to being able to stay on topic better.
And yet, on page #218, you say this:
Quote
In the first place, the stuff written at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 isn't really the evidence. It only points at the evidence.
No, I'm not upset. I'm amazed that you are saying "proof" = "stuff [that] isn't really the evidence [and] only points at the evidence."