Yes, I know all about proof by contradiction and reductio ad absurdum.  But thanks for the boring refresher course.

Are you claiming that presumption is affirmative?  Of course not; that would be stupid, and almost as pointless as niggling over paraphrasing.

So spare us the sophomoric pedantry and allow some leeway for rhetorical shorthand.  Even Yahoo Answers knows better than to pull that crap:

...

The point is that 60% pro-bloat votes isn't anywhere near the desired, much less required, consensus.  And you don't get to count the agnostic/DGAF votes as 'anti-anti-fork' as Gavin illogically did.