Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [VNL] VanillaCoin.net [WhirlpoolX Algo] [Whitepaper Inside] [Poloniex] Update!
by
traumschiff
on 18/03/2015, 08:30:28 UTC
Quote from: Hippie Tech on March 18, 2015, 04:40:58 AM
Quote from: traumschiff on March 17, 2015, 06:51:55 PM
Quote from: Hippie Tech on March 17, 2015, 05:05:13 PM
Quote from: LovSan on March 17, 2015, 04:27:02 PM
Quote from: Hippie Tech on March 17, 2015, 04:13:22 PM
Quote from: LovSan on March 17, 2015, 03:31:58 PM
Quote from: Hippie Tech on March 17, 2015, 03:22:51 PM
Quote from: LovSan on March 17, 2015, 02:59:58 PM
Quote from: Hippie Tech on March 17, 2015, 02:51:45 PM
Quote from: traumschiff on March 17, 2015, 01:42:05 PM
Quote from: LovSan on March 17, 2015, 01:23:11 PM
Quote from: traumschiff on March 17, 2015, 12:54:39 PM
News 17/03

  • backupwallet feature is finished, will be implemented in the next update
  • private key import feature is being worked on (importprivkey), will be implemented in the next update
  • the visual bug during staking is being monitored and worked on
  • Wolf0 will soon release an open source miner for AMD GPUs
  • hardfork was successful, exchanges and pools are up to date, please update your personal wallets also in case you didn't yet
  • ETA for the next update is less than a week
  • tipbot is live on the IRC channel

John as always, quite productive and amazing. Thanks for the update.

Yeah, John got my maximum respect as a developer, rarely see anyone working nonstop on his/her project on a daily basis. Vanillacoin has also a unique codebase, so it's probably more time consuming.

Indeed. So unique that it sucked back over 2gb (1.5gb upload/ 0.5gb download) of my bandwidth in less than 6 hours. Thats pretty freakin odd considering how only 41%/ 39mb of the blockchain actually made it to my HDD. WTF is going on here ?

And .. should I be surprised to see the shitalgo King preying on yet another shitalgo cpu only coin ?

Running 24/7 - 754MB so far (in/out) in a month.

uTorrent as a reference 24/7 - 83.17GB (in/out) in a month.

Didn't get the second part, it's not a CPU only coin.

EDIT: uTorrent in past 31 days - 2.6TB, watched wrong section.

This, like SPR and many others, didn't start that way.

How much VNL was gpu mined before the (deoptimized) kernel became public ?

If you are talking about GPU performance in the early days and now, it stays pretty much the same +20-30% maybe (don't know exact numbers), Wolf0 still has not published his optimized kernels yet.

Either your english isn't very good or you are ignoring the obvious.

The answer to my last question is, ALOT. lol

Just look through Wolf0's posts and count the cpu only coins he and his collaborators have created.

The first: Actually yes, it's not as well as I wanted it to.
The second: I'm ignoring the fact, that you are a troll and trying my best to answer to you as to a common folk.
The third and the last: VNL is not CPU only coin, so I don't care how many coins Wolf0 has already created or will create in the future, he has no connections with this project.

VNL was launched as cpu only. They were using the gpu kernel(s) long before it was made public.

You have been duped, scammed, ripped off..

So you call this project a long con, a code which was checked by some well known people/devs (not going to go into names) and they were amazed by it, and please remember, this isn't a clone of bitcoin, it took more than 5 mins of copy pasting to build this. So let it be mate, if this turns out to be a scam I'll simply leave crypto and delete my account here.

Meanwhile please moderate yourself and troll somewhere else.

Ok..ok.. 10 minutes. Tongue Considering how many of these "new" algos you guys have already put out, you must be running out of easy combos to use. Wink

IF the code really was that Shocked amazing Shocked, why did you make it so easy for wolf0 ? Did you even bother with coding a gpu kernel ?

I'm still waiting for an explanation about the 2gb of bandwith your client drank the other night.

@all

I'll repeat..
Quote
Just look through Wolf0's posts and count the cpu only coins he and his collaborators have created.

That said, it is quite possible that one person could make a coin seem legit and popular. All it takes is several spam bots and 5-10 BTC (if that lol) for voting/bribes and faking market volume/demand.

Your comment just shows that you have no clue on what your talking about. If you take a second and try to understand my comment and also check the OP and the sourcecode you will see that I (and the people I'm talking about) didn't call the algo amazing (which is also something special though), but the built-from-scratch codebase which isn't a clone from the bitcoin.

The X11/X15/scrypt/you name it coins all have the same codebase: bitcoins. You came here without even reading the whitepaper or going through the source on github. I honestly doubt Wolf0 and his friends ever built something even similar (in case what your saying is true, that they build coins, which I doubt).

Is this enough reasoning to make you go away? Legendary member and you really have no clue on what your fuding? Can you even read the code?