voip cannot walk throught the TOR network, because TOR don't support UDP protocol. We use TOR only for the p2p network, it's fully encrypted and guarantees your privacy throught the network (read it like your ISP). in addition permit to users that live in a internet controlled areas to use the wallet.
about POW it's very important for refresh users in the community and take more attentions. Miners always search a good coin to mine. If you look the most important coins, all have POW active yet. POS much more bad, very dangerous for security. maybe I will add a POS option into an external platform only (like a web bank).
Ok, aren't you afraid of increased surveillance from NSA towards TOR and highly probably already several "fake" TOR nodes working as TOR spies in TOR network?
What security risk do mean for POS? As my limited knowledge goes POW has more security risks and also bigger centralization risk.
I appreciate you suggest equal ration between old Kore and Vior holdings. But still I have no idea how it works. Let's say you have 1% of Viors or Kores, what would be the share in new Kore? And also with POW you'll loose ability of your Viors to forge new coins. So I'm worried that 1% of Viors will mean like 0,00001% share (and decreasing all the time because of POW).
I understand that you can attract some new users with POW, but these people are mostly dumpers. Mine much during the beginning - dump. Price stability is poor. From investor POV it's terrible. All stakes are decreasing. POS is much much more appropriate for real business model even if it has no that fast adoption during the beginning. Features should bring users, not ability to mine. And POS is much more suitable for mobile platform. Not talking about general POW inefficiency, etc.