Notice I linked to that above. Which part of it prohibits linking to images, or reselling items? Linking to a long document and claiming it says something isn't helpful. Excerpt the parts you think support your claim.
Read "LICENSE AND ACCESS" and the rest of it too. Is there a particular reason why you adopted Vlad's strategy of posting without reading? Is there a particular reason why you expect me to do your homework?
I read through most of the document, and saw that it doesn't clearly prohibit what coinstand is doing. (It depends, as I said above, on whether images count as software, which seems unlikely).
You made a claim that what they are doing violates the TOS. The burden of proof is on you, so don't try to get out of that by just telling me to read a document that doesn't actually support you.
Oh dear, full on dipshit mode now, huh? And I used to think you have a valuable opinion

It is YOU who is making claims here, not me. Where did I make that claim that you're ascribing to me here? I specifically mentioned affiliate program and advertising API, and you're now making a claim that GAW is not using those, while common sense suggests otherwise. Do you have anything to support YOUR claim, let's start with how would you create and update a catalog like that MANUALLY?
The other fallacy you seem to be propagating here is that this is somehow about whether Amazon would want to sue GAW. They don't need to. They can just terminate their account for violating TOS. Deciding to not do business with someone is not against the law, unless there is some kind of contract in place. Is there?
No Amazon Service, nor any part of any Amazon Service, may be reproduced, duplicated, copied, sold, resold, visited, or otherwise exploited for any commercial purpose without express written consent of Amazon. You may not frame or utilize framing techniques to enclose any trademark, logo, or other proprietary information (including images, text, page layout, or form) of Amazon without express written consent.