Re: [DRK/XDN/XMR/SDC] Comparison between the most known anonymous coins (MUST READ)

dev for SDC.

Enough said, and I'm sure you agree.

Quote from: illodin on March 19, 2015, 11:17:37 PM

I won't be giving my masternode logs to him.

Everyone has a price right? Where did I read that?

@smooth

Pls clarify what you mean. (I made it large and bold. see above. ty.)

SDC people run all over these forums pumping their shit. Its the most blatantly overpromoted coin on this entire forum, and furthermore there are constantly ignorant technical comments made by them about how it is like zerocoin because it has minting, isn't copied from cryptonote, zero-knowledge anonymity, etc. (all false).

It's annoying as all fuck, and its not even done by third party trolls trying to create a backlash the way a lot of the Monero faux-shilling has been. It's actual SDC supporters spamming everywhere.

I am Monero core team. If you think I'm biased, ignorant or a pumper, ignore my posts please.

FUD alert.

Opinion not FUD

FUD = fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

My post promoted none of those, it described what I have seen about your group's behavior. It didn't even say anything about about the coin per se, just about the idiots who post about it.

Well you are saying the minting is nothing at all like zerocoin when it is obvious there are some similarities to anyone who reads the white papers. This is why zerocoin is cited in the shadowcash whitepaper when it talks about minting. You are saying SDC is a complete copy of cryptonote, when there are many differences, which we all know. Shadow uses anonymous tokens and is on a bitcoin blockchain for one. So therefore it is FUD. Also shadow uses anonymous tokens and not direct anonymous outputs for a reason. Its because there is a plan in the future to probably implement zkSNARKS, I am guessing similar to the zerocash whitepaper.

Also Shadow is not just a cryptonote clone like Monero, its a unique system that the devs put time in to build, instead of copying and pasting.