How is it a critique? Well a terrible one at best. He just says "Darkcoin is bad mkaaay?". How is that any kind of argument. Also it looks like boilerplate because I read that empty "sub par anonymity"-phrase earlier somewhere else.
No technical explanation whatsoever.
Whatever happened to the pathetic "We can de-anonymize DarkSend tx"-crowd anyway? None of those losers delivered more than smack talk just like the guy in the screenshot.
Ok, thanks! So my understanding is this: from a purely perfectionist theoretical technical point of view, Darksend might be "subpar", but it has no actual practical relevance because it is safe enough for real world usage? Correct?