They identify themselves to Windoze as BitFORCE SHA256 SC and CGMiner 4.9.1 identifies them as a BAS.
What a pain. That's the identifier for their 65nm hardware. No idea why they put it on mofarchs as well
65nm so far showed up as:
"BitFORCE SHA256 SC"
while 28nm as:
"BitFORCE SC-28nm"
The old FPGA showed up as:
"BitFORCE SHA256"
and then 28nm started showing up as this too.
Now they're mixing the 65nm identifiers with their "new"er hardware. If BFL didn't have bigger problems, I'd say they were doing it deliberately, but this is probably just plain screwup on their part I guess.
What does the iManufacturer field list?