It would be if it were a "rampage". I don't see it that way. I give my opinions, which are frequently disputed, denied or attacked, or responded to by attacking another coin in some non-responsive way.
If opposing views were welcome here and not treated as "trolls" things might go differently. I hate to keep borrowing a term from iCEBREAKER but he's absolute right that attack-the-attacker is the usual MO around here when anyone presents an opposing view.
Furthermore I don't really know that it makes sense to lump together all of the DRK skeptics who are posting here these days (not sure if that's what you meant by rampage either). I certainly don't have any connection with them.
I'm not lumping all the sceptics together. I'm just having a (hopefully) polite public conversation with you. As you are aware, there are a variety of opposing views both here and elsewhere. Some people ask questions. They mostly get answered. Some people point out problems. This can lead in a number of directions. Some people holler "instamine" a hundred times. What are we to do with them?