lol yeah I'm pretty proud of the name for my trollaccount 
Now back on topic, I don't see the ponzi man. By your logic proof of stakes are ponzies too? Masternodes are basically proof of stake with a minimum amount of network weight, in this case 1000drk.
Now back on topic, I don't see the ponzi man. By your logic proof of stakes are ponzies too? Masternodes are basically proof of stake with a minimum amount of network weight, in this case 1000drk.
I can't make a general claim that all PoS coins are Ponzis. Some see all cryptos as Ponzi-esque, some don't.
So let's stick to the specific case of DARSH.
DARSH meets Arizona law's criteria because of the large 1000drk initial buy-in, as well as the ROI table they published.
I really can't believe their lawyer OK'd publishing that ROI table. I doubt they ran it by him first, but could be wrong. Or maybe he's as as dirty as the rest of the board.
The high yields offered by the Masternode investment produce qualify as a pyramid scheme because they create an incentive to bring more people into the scheme.
I don't know how much more clear I can make it.
Fortunately whether or not you "see the ponzi" is not important.
What is important is that the proper State & Federal authorities "see the ponzi."
And we're drawing them a very detailed picture...
