It is accepted by most here that a positive house edge will ultimately wipe out your deposit (rather sooner than later). But we could try to look at this issue from another angle. That is, whether the house is predetermined to lose in the long run if it had a negative house edge? As I see it, a positive house edge doesn't guarantee per se that a casino won't suffer heavy losses, but why should it necessarily suffer them if it had a small negative edge (to attract new users)? In other words, how long will it take till we see a casino claiming just that?
I've never seen a mention of the negative house edge here, so I decided to create a new topic on this issue
I don't think a negative house edge makes sense. : /
A positive house edge doesn't guarantee that the casino won't lose some times, but if it has no bugs players can use and a big bankroll in relation to the bets, it will win in the end, I think. A negative house edge would attract more players, but the house would eventually lose more times than win. Even if a lot of money would be coming into the casino, more would be leaving. Maybe it would be more like a ponzi then lol.