Hi XinXan, I am happy to chat with you; I will link you to some science papers... Please check them out and then tell me if we are in agreement! 
Let's agree on the science of life before we discuss the 'after-life'.
Sir, what about the evidence I have posted in this thread? Don't you think that skeptics should read it?
The Phoenix Journals gift you with facts and proofs of God; in my opinion, the Journals contain the best explanation of the Bible; the emphasis is on personal responsibility, and it is important to realize that God is not JEALOUS and is not wrathful. That is the only suggestion that I have for my brother BADecker.
There is no evidence of god, im sorry but there is no evidence of god at all,
Then how can you explain this?
I don't know. I certainly did not learn the above quoted information in my science class!
"Must be" what if its not. What you said there doesnt show anything, the fact is that we dont know exactly how life originated and you didnt explain it either so as i said before, no evidence of god
Yockey explained why that quote is true, and it is true because that is simply what "stands to reason"; please go back to the source and you will see that this is what is said again and again in Yockey; here are some reviews:
A review of reviews of Yockey: http://www2.asa3.org/archive/evolution/199602/0116.html
A "very favorable" review of Yockey according to Yockey: http://wasdarwinwrong.com/kortho33.htm
Very helpful to check out this email from Yockey as well: http://wasdarwinwrong.com/korthof5.htm#Yockey
If you want to understand how life arose, why not start with the Pye article that I referenced? That is an interesting one! and I am eager to discuss it with you!
Let's agree on the science of life before we discuss the 'after-life'.I think he doesnt know because sometimes he mentions the bible but when someone destroys the bible with facts and proofs he says that the bible has nothing to do with god so i dont know.
Sir, what about the evidence I have posted in this thread? Don't you think that skeptics should read it?
The Phoenix Journals gift you with facts and proofs of God; in my opinion, the Journals contain the best explanation of the Bible; the emphasis is on personal responsibility, and it is important to realize that God is not JEALOUS and is not wrathful. That is the only suggestion that I have for my brother BADecker.
There is no evidence of god, im sorry but there is no evidence of god at all,
Then how can you explain this?
Is life to be explained ONLY by its chemistry? The fact that inheritance
is particulate, linear and digital shows that life must be more than just
complicated chemistry.
is particulate, linear and digital shows that life must be more than just
complicated chemistry.
why do you think we dont study about god in history class?
I don't know. I certainly did not learn the above quoted information in my science class!
"Must be" what if its not. What you said there doesnt show anything, the fact is that we dont know exactly how life originated and you didnt explain it either so as i said before, no evidence of god
Yockey explained why that quote is true, and it is true because that is simply what "stands to reason"; please go back to the source and you will see that this is what is said again and again in Yockey; here are some reviews:
A review of reviews of Yockey: http://www2.asa3.org/archive/evolution/199602/0116.html
A "very favorable" review of Yockey according to Yockey: http://wasdarwinwrong.com/kortho33.htm
Very helpful to check out this email from Yockey as well: http://wasdarwinwrong.com/korthof5.htm#Yockey
If you want to understand how life arose, why not start with the Pye article that I referenced? That is an interesting one! and I am eager to discuss it with you!