Hi Joshuar, I believe I have already responded to your fallacious "arguments".
The concept of the afterlife also applies the notions that souls exist, which they do not.
This fallacy is often stated in this way but what it really means is that belief in the afterlife is not supported by evidence.[T]his notion of
extraordinary claims and proof cannot be considered part of the scientific method. It is only possible to consider it a statement of how bias interferes with objectivity. When skeptics assert this notion, if they are not cynically trying to
misdirect the discussion away from evidence they don't want to consider, and if they are being sincere, then
they are actually demonstrating that they are refusing to consider the evidence objectively.
giving adequate reasons for rejecting the evidence said to prove something exists is equivalent to proving the thing doesn't exist. Therefore, a skeptic can disprove the existence of spirits and the afterlife by giving adequate reasons for rejecting the evidence said to demonstrate their existence.https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/skeptical_fallacies#skeptical_fallacies_extraordinary_claimsJust how do you intend to prove your statement that souls exist not, Joshuar?