Just to be transparent:
I posted the exact same message about this OP in both the Official Dark/Dash OP and Official Monero OP. The one in the Dark/Dash OP was deleted by bitcointalk staff.
Staff usually won't delete posts unless reported.
As I warned you, the Darkheads don't want too see an open, moderated, intelligent, and honest XMR VS DRK debate, so they reported it.
happy to debate openly, let's check the BS points in your sig:
instamine - yawn, yes we know, a bunch of coins were mined early. who gives a fuck? not anyone who's investing if you check the charts.
broken anon - not a single darksend TX has been traced, no matter what gmaxwell or anyone else might say. Trace one or GTFO
ponzy/HYIP - you either don't know what these are, or are just talking shit. Demonstrate, with supporting calculations, how DRK is a HYIP/ponzi or GTFO.
broken maternodes - masternodes run rock-solid, on low-cost VPS, getting paid like fucking clockwork, providing all the services they're supposed to. Demonstrate otherwise or GTFO.
trusted 3rd parties - BS, the only trust is on miners and masternode owners. Miners are trad POW just like BTC, masternode ownership is more distributed than mining (no pools).
stolen name - BS...Dashcoin was a dead project, their dev happily sold the github to DRK so it could use the name. Whining from bagholders of a dead coin doesn't change the facts.
busfactor=1 - BS....DRK/DASH is open source, other devs are involved. Evan under a bus would hurt the coin for sure, like any coin that lost it's lead dev, but there is enough momentum and market cap for others to take over and run with the project. The code is high quality and easily understood by others - see Kristov Atlas review.
no fundamentals - BS, DRK has the strongest fundamentals of any alt hence the market cap and positive trend.