lot of words not much content
You're not factoring in denominated units and "dead change" being sent to the network to remove linkages in future tx's.
^ second proposition today from Fluffy proved to be total BS meaning again he has no idea what he is talking about.
still waiting on response to the 3rd Fluffy proposition: P2P network nodes need failovers or the P2P network becomes insecure.
BlockaFett my friend, I can tell you're passionate about this subject by virtue of the massive amounts of insults you hurl and the sheer amount of bold in your replies. However, please remember that this is a cordial discussion, and if I conclude something based on an incorrect understanding I will absolutely admit that my conclusion was incorrect and based on false assumptions or faulty logic.
I'm not perfect, I will make mistakes, and I do reach conclusions on a regular basis that are incorrect. Over and above that I am analysing a technology I did not create and that has no formal model I can study, and so much of the data I am working with is based on what I have observed and read about the subject matter, and is thus open to change.
All of that does not imply I am talking "total BS" or I have "no idea what I am talking about", it just means that the model I have been forced to construct in my head is in a necessary state of flux.
It's also immensely frustrating when I am trying to reply to comments in the order in which they appear in the thread, and in the time it takes me to thoughtfully reply to one person you've submitted 5 posts that consist of:
- "fluffypony once again proves he knows nothing"
- "why hasn't he answered the simple question?"
- "hah such garbage"
- "obviously wrong and complete BS"
- "still waiting on a reply to that question from 3.7 seconds ago??"
Try and chillax, this is a technical and non-technical back-and-forth, not a personal attack on your family and your second child:)
Hey, i am relaxed thanks, the reason I had to repeat the question 8 times is because you won't answer it. I am using the bold to make it easier for you to read the actual questions because each time you are avoiding it.
Right now I have asked the same question 5 times as a response to your proposition: why is the masternode network unsecure because there are no failovers.
It sounds like a ridiculous proposition, not something from a serious coin dev, which is why I am asking you to back it up. but you won't do it (that should be in bold but i don't want to hurt anyone's feelings
)