awesome. i can see you've been working!
any chance of adding pos2.0 to this baby? anonymity features?
We just recently put the idea of PoS on the table but we want to be sure that the community is 100% for it and that it's 100% fair. We don't want to introduce a standard model that's beneficial only to a few. If anything, we'd look into a DPOS model and currently it's still in the community's hands whether or not they want it. As far as anonymization, we had a great model in place which was removed (explanation can be found here:
http://forum.neoscoin.com/t/neos-and-the-future/316). We're more focused on the usability aspect and for that we just need one thing - a solid payment gateway. The issue that comes with that is our daily volume doesn't average out currently to an acceptable minimum for most of these services so we're just waiting patiently nearby and ready to code for when that day comes.
well im not very familiar with dpos but i think id be fine with any model of pos doesnt matter.. could be anything between 5-15% per annum. just to make sure the network is fast as pos does help with faster transaction speeds and confirmation times. and well, then there is that catch22.. that if you do implement anonymity features you will attract alot more larger investors providing greater liquidity but it may not be a preferred transaction method by merchants. perhaps you could make the anonymity optional on a per transaction basis? coins like drk and xmr thrive on the demand for anonymity features. i think it is a hallmark aspect of crypto for privacy of personal holdings. i definitely share your sentiments and reasons for developing these security features. theft has hurt bitcoin value over and over and if any coin is going to compete with bitcoin and carry steady longterm growth it will have to deal with the issue of preventing theft and providing security for it's investors.