(context above, no need to quote on every single post).
No actually that is when you called P3RS3US AKA child_harold a dumb shit. Here is when you called me a dumb shit. I was just quoting our lead dev rynomster. So you basically called him a dumb shit too:
I don't care who it is. Anyone who says that "tokens" in SDC are anything more than just outputs is either dumb or lying, as shown by the above excerpt from the SDC whitepaper.
Amusingly the response I got on the other thread for pointing that out was to be accused of faking the whitepaper LOL.
Well I think you misunderstood what I said smooth. What I was simply trying to say was what ryno said. That they chose anonymous tokens instead of "direct anonymous outputs to ring sigs" because they are building towards a certain direction. I accidentally left out the words "to ring sigs", when I mentioned it, which probably confused you.
Except that the above quoted phrase "outputs on the ShadowCash chain" is exactly "direct anonymous outputs to ring sigs" (ShadowCash chain outputs are spent using ring sigs).
It's a bunch of double talk imo.
SNARKS aren't fully ready and trustless yet from what they have said so they are waiting for the tech to advance. They are striving for a goal of anonymity, and SNARKS look very promising, and could play a role in the future. There could be other solutions instead as well, and ryno said they are not limiting themselves to ideas. Hope that clears things up. I will be exiting this thread now. Please carry on, again we have same goal of anonymity and privacy. Its better to work with each other than against each other.
Thank you for the input here.