Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Remove VOD from the Default Trust List - clear case of neg for calling out abuse
by
TECSHARE
on 27/03/2015, 01:13:14 UTC
Come on guys, Vod willl be never removed from the default trust (level 2 -depth). In these days I have seen the Meta section full of topics about "Vod", can you stopl please? Thanks.

Tell me please, what do those other threads about Vod have to do with me? I didn't start them, why are they my responsibility? Why is it because a lot of other people make threads accusing him some how my complaint has less value? That doesn't sound at all like you are reviewing the facts but simply letting your confirmation bias take its course. Don't you think the continual stack of complaints against Vod might be a symptom of his behavior instead of just being a petty nuisance for you to read so many thread titles with his name in it?

Vod clearly abused his position on the default trust to silence me from speaking out about his abuse. He can't even explain his rating without contradicting himself. Him abusing my reputation costs you nothing, so frankly your opinion is meaningless to me because in reality it doesn't effect you to just pretend he isn't abusing his position on the default trust list. I have a right to bring his abuse to public light regardless of your opinions on the matter. If you don't like all the threads about Vod, perhaps Vod's behavior has something to do with it and you should address him.

Quote
I am simply pointing out that it is far easier to attack me rather than some one like you whom, it might be fair to say is in "the good old boys" network,
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=846683.msg9454243#msg9454243
November 06, 2014, 01:56:46 AM

Like I posted, there are dozens of examples, some that precede my leaving you negative trust (obviously).  I just don't care to search for them all - you may feel free to.

This debate has run it's course and is over.   Undecided


Oh I see, so your story has changed now. Amazing how that works after I demonstrate your inconsistencies. I don't need dozens of examples, I need one comment that you can verify as a lie (not that that is an excuse for neg rating me but the fact that you can't provide this demonstrates your disingenuous reasons for leaving the rating).

Please tell me how this is a lie about you, and how you can demonstrate it is false, otherwise you are just trying to fluff up your personal revenge with empty window dressing.

Proof Vod changed the rating to a negative as a direct result of my criticism of his behavior when mass negging key sellers in a related thread. Some one takes notice of his neutral rating for me, suddenly he feels it should be changed back to negative as he is enraged because I dare to challenge him:

2. I see he left a neutral feedback instead of a negative on your account. Weird.

You know what?   That is weird.  I have corrected it.  

He is using the trust system to attempt to silence anyone critical of his actions.

It is quite convenient that Vod declares the debate over right as I prove his claims have no substance by demonstrating the inconsistencies in his own statements. You still have not responded as to why this is a lie about you. You have not provided even a single justification for your rating for me that you conveniently decided to make a negative in the middle of a discussion about your abusive behavior that I was a party to. Of course it is because I "lied" about you, not because you are annoyed that I am exposing your abusive actions and you want me to stop talking about it.