Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)

Quote from: Paul Revere on March 29, 2015, 08:08:37 PM

Quote from: vObh0n]6W on March 29, 2015, 08:01:26 PM

Here's some proof that this was customers, at least partially. I followed the transaction Paul linked until it led to https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/tx.dws?474805.htm. That sends 3.21 XPY to PMinemanWoBbpPhxeoV7Zy8kND6nMZJMSR.htm. That struck me as a vanity address, so I googled it, and came across https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:10aSkaqC_JIJ:https://hashtalk.org/topic/31206/wallet-minting%3Fpage%3D1+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us. (https://archive.today/0FT9O in case it goes expires).

So this address was in someone's sig over a month ago. Does that qualify as an "average Joe" who got a withdrawal, or did I somehow make them up or something?

Also, they said they were manually confirming transactions. These could have been from the backlog.

But go on denying the evidence, it's cute.

Good find, ikeboy. You have uncovered 1 transaction going to a real person , coming from the mixing groups. Well done. How does that change that the other 99.999% of transactions go to either exchanges or accumulator wallets? When you are done tracing all of those, then you can work on an explaination of how these mixing transactions kept occurring the whole time Paybase was locked up and people could not do transactions.

You said that zero transactions went to customers, I disproved that. Many addresses have been in use for months, but don't show up in google searches other than blockchain results. Those probably belong to individuals who didn't post it online. It's not possible to prove one way or another who such an address belongs to, and note that what I said above was that it's possible for it to be matching withdrawals, not that it was definite. They could be skimming off also.

And as for paybase being down, which I didn't test at the time, there could have been a backlog that was approved while it was down. Was it down during the entire range of transactions?