we covered this already too didn't we?
even if you gained control of 51% of masternodes, you would have:
1) 0.000000000000000000000403286875% probability of deanonymizing a transaction
2) 0.0% of making any money
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1001642.msg10900308#msg10900308
so 'hosting it on a centralized server is much more "dangerous" than for a regular node' is just a crock and you know it because we already talked about it right?
even if you gained control of 51% of masternodes, you would have:
1) 0.000000000000000000000403286875% probability of deanonymizing a transaction
2) 0.0% of making any money
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1001642.msg10900308#msg10900308
so 'hosting it on a centralized server is much more "dangerous" than for a regular node' is just a crock and you know it because we already talked about it right?
This is not a good argument.
If you gain 51% of the Monero nodes you would have 0% of both. With Bitcoin maybe you could argue that being able to link a node to a transaction will let you follow the blockchain trail and figure out stuff that node has been involved in, but I also guess that it's a harder link to prove.
So therefore 51% attack for deanonimization is pointless for BOTH Dash and Monero.
The problem with Monero for me, is that during DASH anonimization, the info isn't recoverable. In Monero it is, with a viewkey, or if someone found a backdoor......so you have to ask, how anonymous do you want?
(are you really not from XMR?
)