SO I ASK THIS THREAD: WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE TO TALK ABOUT GOD WHEN THERE IS PROOF OF THE AFTERLIFE RIGHT HERE AND NOBODY WANTS TO TALK ABOUT IT?!
If you find something that I post to be in conflict with any other information, please make that known! I have made every effort to remove such conflicts from the information I present here humbly.
There is no proof of the afterlife. A body starts dying, the brain is deprived of oxygen and starts firing neurons at random, the brain interprets that as reality.
Certainly not proof.
Yes, but if you ask a dead guy for the proof of an afterlife, you won't get any answer, either. This doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. It simply means that the afterlife isn't for those living in this life.
Blakjag has all kinds of info that suggests there is an afterlife. What Blakjag is wrong about is what that afterlife consists of. A medium gets info from somewhere. We don't know who or what is transferring the info.
The important thing that Blakjag is missing regarding this thread, he could be proving that God exists, like the title of the thread requests. Rather, he wants to go off into a lot of unproven, suggestive ideas that are beyond the scope of the topic.
Most of the folks who post a lot here, and don't believe in God, are way off topic. Much of what they do is badmouth God believers, or say that there is no proof for God when the stuff that I present at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 shows that at the very least, if a person can barely think, the odds are that God exists, by a long shot. Anyone who looks at the link info and is a bit of a thinker, can see the proof that God exists. Nobody shows proof that God DOESN"T exist.
The thinking, intelligent unbelievers are simply liars, because there is no other way to interpret the info at the link than to see that God exists.
EDIT: Some say that there is no way that anybody could prove that God doesn't exist. Well, this is another piece of evidence suggesting that He does exist.
Thats just another fallacy, suggesting that because you cant disprove something means it exists. You are just full of fallacies man, we are trying to explain it to you but you choose to ignore it.
No, the things that you are trying to do are these. You are trying to get me to capitulate into your fallacies so that you have comfort in the idea that one of the few people who shows proof for God was wrong after all. You are trying to get me to suggest that I am wrong when I am not to keep the political and scientific status quo as it is. Common understanding of the things shown at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 proves that I am right.
What's your big hang-up, anyway. If you broke your arm, you wouldn't simply say, "I don't believe it," and get on with life with a broken arm like nothing ever happened. No. You would get the arm taken care of, by the medical if at all possible. Why do you keep on resisting the knowledge that God exists when it has been proven to you, when you can prove it to yourself?
Wake up and see that God really DOES exist so that you can go the next step and see the good that He is all about... FOR YOU.