Just because they are listed as partner, doesn't mean he owns it or anything.
Of course! I would prefer he speak for himself though on his involvement with that company. I am only trying to understand the bigger picture here since we can all agree there is something that just doesn't feel right.
Partner probably means Roberto is working with them on deposit/withdrawal methods like he does with other exchanges, same like Bitinstant.
Could be, but I'd prefer Roberto speak for himself. Thanks!
Also, you should know that Roberto, Mark and I all agreed that Roberto should bring the information to the forums that he found.
As he said, you can bring him to court if you think it was illegal to do so.
I don't think it's my job to bring him to court. I don't have an AurumXChange account. My job is to uncover the truth and be unwavering, even in the light of louder voices and big business.
You misread my statement. Our lawyers told us it was a breach of TOS to release information BitInstant had on Zhou Tong according to US law, not AurumXChange
I understood your statement. What I'm wondering is why that doesn't also apply to AurumXchange. Are their TOS and Privacy policy so much different from BitInstant? I can't find the privacy policy for BitInstant online anywhere so I couldn't check. Thank you for clarifying though, I am sure Roberto can clear it up on his own.
Man, Im so jealous of you right now, all this controversy is forsure helping you sell some magazines!
If Bit-Pay would add a "referral" tag to their invoicing system to show where orders were coming from, I'd gladly tell you if that were true or not, but I assume it's not. I'm not here representing the magazine, I'm here as a forum user who still feels there's some funny business going on and just trying to answer questions so I can put it to rest.