If someone makes wild allegations without any grounds then no...noone will comment on that.
It's common practice to publish source code for review. Exactly for the reason mentioned in that my post. Noone needs any grounds to assume that software is insecure, all programs working with cryptography and financial stuff are assumed insecure until audit is done.
It is one thing to assume and ask for the code.
It is another thing to...
after Jinn is released.
This is too long to wait, I doubt that NEM devs will keep ordinary users unprotected against hackers that long.
...imply that the devs deliberatly leave users unprotected against hackers. You could have just asked to do a code review. Like a normal person public or private. But no - you have to always play your little games. If your job right now is to asses the security of cryptos then you suck at it - hard - because appearantly you can't talk to anyone without playing mindgames which won't exactly guarantee their cooperation.