A 3 second query turned this up, I'm sure more details could be found, but it would be beneficial for all for them to simply provide the current up to date information. Legally, if ownership and other matters have exchanged hands, it needs to be updated in all the proper paperwork, if it hasn't already.
http://www.corporationwiki.com/p/2g1k9c/cryptorush-llchttp://www.corporationwiki.com/p/2h2bd6/cryptorush-llc2 Members:
Chad Creighton (also a part of Creighton Publishing, listed as the President)
Stephen Benignus
Houston, Texas, 77005
2429 Bissonnet St
Yeah, that site is awful. I have used it in the past to dig up information on clients, but it really isn't all that helpful. All it is there for is a little teaser, hoping you'll purchase a Dun & Bradstreet report. Sort of like googling someone's name and all of the links that pop up first, "Click here for a full background check on ...insert name here..." But if you think you found something, run with it

Wait a minute don't you not own Crypto Rush and have nothing to do with it?
Why are you still talking then?
If you have no involvement in any of this why are you still claiming to?

If you bought Crypto Rush you are responsible for any accumulated debts the previous Crypto Rush owners had...
You do know that right?
It's kind of a law in like well pretty well every country in the world....
Well, had you read any of what you quoted you would be able to answer your own questions. Why am I speaking? Because I am trying to answer the questions that people have. Would it be better to just leave everyone hanging, stewing in their own speculation? If so, go right ahead. Nobody is forcing you to read this thread. I never claimed to have no involvement in any of this. Do I own CryptoRush? No. Am I involved? Yes. Involvement and ownership are two completely different things.