Why is not doing that bad? Why is working on this tech without the pressure of a release date a bad thing?
I'm in no rush, it's ready when it's ready and I'll make those announcements when I feel the vision is complete, the tech is ready, we are happy with it, and the dates are achievable.
We have developed tech that no ones even close to having, and that takes time, so it's worth doing right, because from where I'm sitting no one else has other that Satoshi. And the "competition", it's small fry in the grand scheme of things.
I'm in no rush, it's ready when it's ready and I'll make those announcements when I feel the vision is complete, the tech is ready, we are happy with it, and the dates are achievable.
We have developed tech that no ones even close to having, and that takes time, so it's worth doing right, because from where I'm sitting no one else has other that Satoshi. And the "competition", it's small fry in the grand scheme of things.
You say you sit equal to Satoshi, but yet his implementation and work to develop the blockchain is what your work is based on whether you use the same code or not, for you did not make eMunie before Satoshi's Bitcoin; we must regard the source of our growth before claiming fame from another.
Keep in mind NXT, Ripple, Steller, etc. all have unique code bases written from scratch, with each claiming their "innovation" is superior. Look at Apple and Microsoft, Apple clearly had the better Technology, but Gates played the game better. Sadly, this is the condition of earth
Thank You,
Viz.
P.S. That anonymous option will bite you in the ass when you try to establish regulation, which is necessary if you are wanting to replace the existing financial systems with your "Electronic Money Units". May I suggest an alternative of "Electronic Monetary Units" as that to me seems more proper, but of course just my opinion
Also curious, your claim "Highest levels of security that technology can provide".
What's your minimum bit length for your keys and cryptography?