http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_manYou're engaging in more straw mans. It's very easy to beat an opponent's argument when you ignore their argument, make a new one up and rip it apart. It doesn't change what I said before and you have ignored and strawed man it twice in a row.
As well you keep engaging in an Ad nauseam, which is not proof of your assertion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_nauseamMy reputation? Couldn't be much worse than yours. Classification of being a troll is an individual determination (you are troll to some but not to others) and you have been considered a troll too before, as have I, but you are the code monkey who slops out the crap code.
No more ad nauseam fallacies. You made your bed and go lie in it. The market speaks for Jinn. Anyway going away from the computer momentarily, keep engaging in those ad nauseams.
So you keep evading the discussion about the bet. I (and the others) got you. Intensive quoting of Wikipedia articles doesn't add credibility to your posts.