=snip=
naked people have nothing to do with bitcoin or bitcointalk.org, bosses don't like naked people.
naked people have nothing to do with bitcoin or bitcointalk.org, bosses don't like naked people.
Well we got some threads going on in the forum that contain NSFW content; specifically non-sexual nudity (thus non-pornographic). I was just implying when people state that Nudity=Porn they're wrong. Non-sexually explicit nudity is not porn.
In the case of avatars fine... No NSFW stuff; that I concur with.
Well, you may think like that but you can't make everybody think like you do. Different people see contents at different level and hence, what is not NSFW for you maybe NSFW for another person.
After all, you went away from basic: "Not suitable or safe for work".
That's right. The example you've been talking about (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=358121) is IMO completely safe. If the girl was naked, sure, but she isn't, and on top of that she isn't real, it's just a drawing. You can stumble upon much more exposed ladies when googling for important stuff at work, why aren't you worried about that. Also, if your boss is unhappy when he sees a drawing of a busty girl in a swimsuit there's something wrong with him, not the picture.
I may not care; but, a g/f of mine just saw the picture and told me it looks like a pedo's cartoon girl.
Not sure if she maybe right, but i thinks it's something to reflect on.